Featured News

- Helpful Bear Production's Launchs Kaiju Creature Design Contest, Judged By Terryl Whitlatch  

« morning warmups | Main | Call it what you want. »

Ethereal Filcher

Hi guys, I finished this piece some time ago and wanted to share with you.

It's called "Ethereal Filcher" and it's a creature from D&D Monsters' Manual. When I first saw the illustration in the manual I thought it was awesome, always love it.. very bizzarre and somehow weird.

My sculpt actually differs form the original for its leg: with the help of Mike Corriero (thank you:P) it end up having a split hip joint leading to one where the original have just one leg from the top to bottom.

I'm trying to do the textures but not happy with it, so for now here is the sculpt.

Hope you like it!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

Great design decision to split the leg into two- I definitely agree it helps it looks way more balanced and plausible, and plausible and this thing are not easily put together, 'cause, let's face it, it's a really weird creature anatomically, and yet you definitely improved it, well done! =^)

My main critique would be the hands- anatomically they look spot on, but from a personal preference, I really like how spindly the original creature's finger design is. They may actually be thinner than they appear on the model, but due to foreshortening of this pose it's difficult to tell. If they are, then disregard. Part of what I feel makes this creature so creepy are the spindly, immaciatedly thin fingers, and I think it would be a great transition to go from the fat, bulbous body to rail-thin arms and hands, which arm-wise you've definitely got going there.

Though I'm sure you have an image, here is a link for other commenters to see the comparison:

My only other suggestion would be to revisit the "eye sockets" of the upper tubercle-like growth atop its head. I feel the outer ridge of the eye sockets is a little overdefined and appear more like they were "poked in" with a sculpting tool rather than as a gradual, organic socket depth like in the original design. I think enlarging them slightly would also indicate what I feel is the goal of the original design- the upper tube is like a remnant spinal neck with a vistigial human skull, at least what remains of it before it became this phallic growth.

Part of what's scary about this creature is that it has human and foreign elements. Take Giger's Alien as an example. It's so different, yet so similar to our anatomy. The skull under the dome is a freaky, brilliant concept. Why this wasn't continued at least in part I have yet to understand, but that familiarity yet "alien" design is what makes the creature so scary. Giger knew this and even talks about it in a documentary on how he intentionally made certain aspects more familiar and others more unusual. The fact that we can relate to something so horrifying, yet so different is truly what is subconsciously scary about it.

This is a beautiful model and it's clear you've spent a lot of time on it. I hope my crit was positive and constructive for you, because that was my intention. I think every artist has an inherent fear of coming off as "preachy and all knowing" when they crit, and I hope you don't take my suggestions in that way. I love when people crit my work since it is a chance to improve, but I also know not all crits are golden or necessarily good, but I hope my high respect for this piece is apparent. =^)

Thanks for sharing your work!

April 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJason

I really like this - a very convincing job between the muscles, bone structure and very soft feeling tissue. I might have tried a few other approaches to the additional element extruding from the head, but thats just an opinionated gut feeling.

Started with a base mesh, or Zspheres? Posed in Zbrush?

April 18, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJake collinge

Thanks guys for the feedbacks!
@Jason: thank you Jason, your observations are really appreciated and helpfull! I agree with you about the fingers and the opposition between the body mass and the thinner arms and fingers. Actually the foreshortening isn't playing a good job about this and if you take a look at other images of the model in my website ( you can see that they are longer then they seems to be in this image. But yes, for example the addition of the fingernails was something that I thought about very much and right now I'm still wondering if it was a good choice or not.
About the upper "face", after a close review of the concept I come out thinking that it was not a face but 2 nostrils and a mouth like opening. So this is why the two little hole are not structured like eyes. Off course it still seems a face and I think it was an intention of the concept artist to give this impression, I liked and I replicated this on my model.
Btw, thank you Jason for your feedback, you nailed some of the flaws of the model I should improve to better match the concept!
@Jake: Thanks Jake! I did a mesh in Silo and then sculpted in ZB where I also posed the model.

April 19, 2010 | Registered CommenterLoden

Awesome! This was one of my favorite creatures from that particular Monster Manual. I was excited to see it here!

Across the East London skyline, armies of cranes are busy assembling industrial Coach Outletjigsaw pieces into seductively curved OlympicCoach Outlet stadia. But a mere javelin's throw away from this shiny modern Coach Outletmetropolis sits the Queen's Head, an aging East End pub, which, judging by the interior, Chanel Handbagshasn't changed much since London last hosted the Olympics in 1948. Once a popularCoach Outlet haunt for locals, the Queen's Head has been hemorrhaging drinkers and profits in Chanel Bagsrecent years, so landlord Bill Sinefield, who has 20 years' experience in the trade, Coach Factory Outletwas brought in by the owners in a last-ditch attempt to save the place from Coach Outlet Onlineclosure. Despite introducing drink deals and live-music nights, Sinefield is still Coach Outletstruggling to bring in customers. He reluctantly admits Coach Outletthat next summer, when the Olympics go to London, could be make or Louis Vuitton Bagsbreak for the Queen's Head. "You can't just build your business around the Games, Coach Factory Outletbut we are certainly in need of the boost," says Sinefield. "Times are pretty Louis Vuitton Bagstough at the moment."The story of the Queen's Head will resonate with pub owners Coach Factory Storeacross the U.K. What was once a cornerstone of British society has been slowly Coach Outletcrumbling since the 1980s, and the recessionCoach Factory Outlet has many predicting the death of the British pub. In the Coach Outlet Storefirst half of 2011, around 14 pubs were closing each week (in 2009, in the Coach Factory Outletimmediate wake of the financial crisis, the pub trade was seeing 52 casualties a week).Coach Outlet The 2007 smoking ban, the availability of cheapChanel Bags supermarket booze and a beer tax that has risen by 35% since 2008 have Chanel Bagsled many publicans to lay the blame solely at the feetLouis Vuitton of government. Then in November, the government announced that it Coach Factory Storewould not take any action over the beer tie, a controversial contract that forces Chanel Handbagslandlords to buy expensive beer from the company Coach Outletthat owns their premises, a decision described by one union as a Chanel Bags"disaster for the pub industry." With a backdrop this bleak Louis Vuittonit's little wonder London's 9,000 landlords are hoping Coach Factory Onlinefor an Olympic payday.But if they want to gain from the Coach OutletGames, they'll need to find a way to pull tourists away from the big event. When deciding how to Chanel Bagsquench the thirst of the 11.8 million people expected Coach Outletto descend upon London for the Olympics, organizers overlooked Louis Vuitton BagsBritain's 900 breweries and awarded exclusive beer rights to Heineken, meaning the Coach Factory OutletDutch brewer will be the sole supplier of beer and cider in all Olympic venues. Chanel BagsOfficials defended the decision by pointing out that Heineken's U.K. operating company Coach Factoryis based in Edinburgh, but the country's pub community feels betrayed by the loss of the chance to promote British pub culture to hordes of tourists.

December 13, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterCoach Outlet

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>